General > General Forum

Election

<< < (3/5) > >>

tlynnec:
wow, that was a surprisingly calm analysis for any online political posting.  *tips her hat to Crypticgimp*

crypticgimp:
*blink blink*  thank you?

tlynnec:
=P

KillJoy:
I really didn't like Kerry, but I guess he was less radical than Bush in views and policy from what works and has worked in the past.  Bush wishes to attack Iraqi while North Korea was getting together a nuke program.  

If I had been going to war with anyone it would have been North Korea because they were already required to do things per treaties and rules in place and agreed on.  It is a sign of weakness that we left them alone to take care of a place that didn't even have weapons of mass distruction so that North Korea could finish building theirs.

tlynnec:
well, the only part of that i agree with is the not liking Kerry part. ;P

I don't see Bush's policies as radical at all.  Maybe it's because I'm from a military family, but I fully support our actions in Iraq.  And Iraq violated treaties and inernational agreements as well.  Now, I'm not saying that ignoring North Korea is great, but considering that they really started causing trouble after we were already in Iraq, I think jumping in over there would not be a wise idea.  The US may be the only nation to win a war on two fronts in two theaters in the last 100 years, but that still doesn't make it an intelligent tactical decision.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page