You can say that, but again, which does society judge harshly, and which favorably? One who, with evil intent, commits an act that brings about great fortune, or one who, with good or benevolent intent, commits an act that brings about great misfortune? And not just society's judgement, but which person does more good? And how will history judge him?
One of the roles of advanced society and culture is to channel the 'evil intent' in this manner. For instance, with capitalism, a despicable, greedy, power-hungry, evil man can start a business with the intent to become filthy rich with more money than he can spend. Even if he gives nothing to charity or cares to help others, his business provides livelihood to thousands, with employment, and his extravagant lifestyle and purchases of luxury items help other businesses. Though he has never committed a single act out of 'good' intent, or a single 'good' act, much good has come about because of him, and the world is a better place b'cos the evil man was born, and allowed to live.
苍天已死,黄天当立,岁在甲子,天下大吉